Saturday, September 14, 2019
Northanger Abbey Transformations
ââ¬Å"Explore the theme of Transformations in ââ¬Å"Northanger Abbeyâ⬠In ââ¬Å"Northanger Abbeyâ⬠Austen crafts from start to finish a perfect paradigm of her own satirical wit and burlesqued humour, which go to all lengths imaginable to disguise and embed her novelââ¬â¢s transformations. These demonstrate her great skill as a satirist in making the reader dig for their own enjoyment.Her meaning is drenched in multiple interpretations causing even complete opposites like the transformed and unchanged to blur together, leaving as Fuller says, ââ¬Å"The joke on everyone except Austenâ⬠; whose sophisticated ââ¬Å"meta-parodyâ⬠carries on transforming and confusing the reader (Fuller, Miriam 2010). Craik first contrived how to delve into Austenââ¬â¢s satire, and that was by realising that ââ¬Å"The literary burlesque is not incidental, nor integralâ⬠(Craik, W A 1965).In my essay I am therefore going to delve deeply into the satirical, and reveal the true transformations Austen intended to present. The first line of the text identifies Catherine Morland as the novelââ¬â¢s central figure for transformation ââ¬Å"No one who had ever seen Catherine Morland in her infancy would have supposed her born to be an heroineâ⬠(Austen, Jane ââ¬Å"Northanger Abbeyâ⬠2003 PP. 5). Austen then ironically, and ambiguously, decks her out to be a burlesqued parody of the heroic archetype, thus transforming the perspective of what constitutes a heroine.Traditionally they were thought of as intelligent, beautiful and isolated like Eleanor Tilney, but we are told Catherine is ââ¬Å"Occasionally stupidâ⬠¦almost prettyâ⬠¦and (her father) was not in the least addicted to locking up his daughtersâ⬠(PP. 5 ââ¬â 7). Austen reverses the polarity of Catherineââ¬â¢s character transforming her into a more modern heroine, her point being that anyone can be a heroine as long as they evolve as opposed to stagnating like tradit ional gothic figures such as Emily St Aubert (Radcliffe, Anne 2008).Already Austen is choosing transformation and change over self-stagnation, while with feminist intentions breaks down the barrier that portrays women as self-reliant on the patriarchal strength of men by encouragement to live life on their own terms like Catherine Morland ââ¬Å"Let me go, Mr Thorpeâ⬠¦. do not hold me! â⬠(PP. 73). Austen introduces the unchanged character of Eleanor Tilney to highlight ââ¬Å"Catherineââ¬â¢s subconscious refusal to be helpless and passiveâ⬠(Fuller, Miriam 2010).Eleanor unlike Catherine relies on men for support throughout her life first her father, and then through a ââ¬Å"man of fortune and consequenceâ⬠, which shows ââ¬Å"her real power (to be) nothingâ⬠(PP. 185), in the light of Eleanorââ¬â¢s lack of transformation Catherineââ¬â¢s transformative nature is apparent by direct contrast. By deviating from this generic norm Austen sets up Catherin eââ¬â¢s own transformation from innocent, naive girl to blossoming, self-reliant woman. However many critics have debated whether or not Catherine in fact changes at all.This is the case for her intuition, which is part of what Fuller called ââ¬Å"Catherineââ¬â¢s defencesâ⬠(2010), which according to Schaub: ââ¬Å"Catherineââ¬â¢s romantic temperament, her ââ¬Å"intuition,â⬠is right in all her basic judgmentsâ⬠(2000). Schaub is referencing Catherineââ¬â¢s interpretation of individuals such as General Tilney which all turn out to be correct ââ¬Å"in suspecting General Tilney of either murdering or shutting up his wife, she had scarcely sinned against his character, or magnified his crueltyâ⬠(PP. 183). A true transformation however does occur in Catherine abandoning her gothic unreality for ââ¬Å"objective realityâ⬠(Butler, Marilyn 1975).Her change is illustrated in the fading out of Austenââ¬â¢s free indirect narrative, observed in volu me one, for the true direct narrative perspective of Catherine herself, heard strongly in her condemnation of Isabella ââ¬Å"she must think me an idiot, or she could not have written soâ⬠( PP. 161). This narrative change shows the growth of mind that Austen observes in her own character, and she allows her the freedom to use it which has Catherine; through transformative mistakes; gain a greater perspective on the world ââ¬Å"Nothing could shortly be clearer, than that it had been all a voluntary, self-created delusionâ⬠(PP. 46). Lastly a final sign of her ultimate growth is a change in her setting of choice after marrying Henry Tilney. Instead of the sublime gothic grandeur of the abbey she chooses the simplistic pastoral setting of the parsonage ââ¬Å"In her heart she preferred it to any place she had ever beenâ⬠(PP. 156). The abbey of Northanger, that Catherine rejects, is traditionally seen as the key location for all gothic goings on. However it is my joint assertion with Fuller, that ââ¬Å"the social codes of Bath are as labyrinthine as he passageways of Udolpho are to Emilyâ⬠, and according to Drabble ââ¬Å"like a minefieldâ⬠(2010) for the young Catherine Morland. Austen uses satire once again to confuse and camouflage the full roles these two settings play, making for a clever and shocking juxtaposition as settings now transform along different lines. This is done through almost frequent and obvious references to the gothic in the anti-gothic setting of Northanger ââ¬Å"Darkness impenetrable and immoveable filled the roomâ⬠(PP. 124) while contrasting it to more subtle and less noticeable gothic in Bath ââ¬Å"Mr Thorpe only laughed, smacking his whipâ⬠( PP. 2). If we follow Fullerââ¬â¢s argument that ââ¬Å"Northanger abbeyâ⬠is part of what she terms the ââ¬Å"Domestic Gothicâ⬠(2010); a genre that highlights the sexual threat to young women; the then humorous misadventures of Catherine in Ba th turn into events that closely resemble sexual abuse. Particularly in the character of John Thorpe who transforms from a bawdy, comic figure, stumbling over himself to marry Catherine, into a sadistic sexual predator. This is seen in the simple contrast when he abducts young Catherine on a trip to ââ¬Å"Blaize castle! â⬠(PP. 0), and Austen transform the light comedy of deception into a ââ¬Å"gothic abduction sceneâ⬠(Fuller, Miriam 2010). In which Thorpe ââ¬Å"lashes his horse into a brisker trotâ⬠and takes her ââ¬Å"into the marketplaceâ⬠(PP. 62) thus turning Catherine into a ââ¬Å"commodityâ⬠to be owned (Fuller, Miriam 2010). In her sudden character transformations Austen shows how she can rework any of her characters in an instance, making them comic one moment and frightening the next, and it is also a warning to young women of the ââ¬Å"powerful and opportunistic members of societyâ⬠that reside in Victorian resort towns like Bath (Full er, Miriam 2010).Austenââ¬â¢s satire, as witnessed, goes to great lengths to confuse and mask her meaning. Her reasoning behind it is simply her own enjoyment, and her desire to praise her medium of choice: the novel. Her complexity and ambiguity are merely part of an elaborate, and in itself satirical complement to novels which she believes display ââ¬Å"the most thorough knowledge of human nature, the happiest delineation of its varieties, and the liveliest effusions of wit and humourâ⬠(PP. 24). Bibliography: Austen, Jane (2003[1818]) Northanger Abbey, Lady Susan, The Watsons and Sandition (Oxford, Oxford University Press) â⬠¢ Fuller, Miriam (2010) ââ¬Å"Let me go, Mr Thorpe; Isabella, do not hold me! : Northanger Abbey at the Domestic Gothicâ⬠Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal (Jane Austen Society of North America) â⬠¢ Craik, W A (1965) ââ¬Å"Jane Austen The Six Novelsâ⬠(W & J MacKay & Co ltd, Chatham, Great Britain) â⬠¢ Schaub, Melissa (2000 ) ââ¬Å"Irony and Political Education in ââ¬Å"Northanger Abbeyâ⬠(Jane Austen Society of North America) http://www. asna. org/persuasions/on-line/vol21no1/schaub. html Accessed (27/0/2012) â⬠¢ Butler, Marilyn (1975) ââ¬Å"Jane Austen and the War of Ideas: The Juvenilia and ââ¬Å"Northanger Abbeyâ⬠(Clarendon Press, Oxford) â⬠¢ Radcliffe, Anne (2008) ââ¬Å"The Mysteries of Udolphoâ⬠(Oxford, Oxford University Press) â⬠¢ Keymer, Thomas (2011 [1997]) ââ¬Å"Northanger Abbey and Sense and Sensibilityâ⬠ââ¬Å"The Cambridge Companion to Jane Austenâ⬠(University Press Cambridge, Cambridge) â⬠¢ Bush, Douglas (1978[1975]) ââ¬Å"Jane Austenâ⬠(The Macmillan Press LTD, London)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.